Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Gordon (magician)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:19, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Paul Gordon (magician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a published magician who does not seem to meet the qualifications for either WP:ENTERTAINER or WP:AUTHOR. Nothing directly evident on Google, GNews, etc., that would qualify for presumption of notability under WP:GNG. BenTels (talk) 15:15, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Magic-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in multiple independent sources. If in-depth coverage in multiple independent sources is added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:13, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 20:42, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - cannot find any online news coverage about Gordon. Only Magic Week seems to have reviewed his (self published?) book. Insufficient proof he's a notable magician or author. Sionk (talk) 21:57, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I agree with the nominator, this gentleman doesn't seem to meet WP:ENTERTAINER or WP:AUTHOR. I'm pretty sure publishing your own books by starting a publishing company meets the presumption of non-notability in WP:NBOOKS. As well, the only cite (dubious whether this is a reliable source) contains this phrase: "Hefty slices are concerned with Paul Gordon publicity…" which suggests to me why this article may have been created. Ubelowme U Me 00:40, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.